AKITA–A high court branch here Wednesday upheld a life sentence handed to a woman who killed her daughter and a neighborhood boy and fueled speculation that a serial killer was roaming the community.
Presiding Judge Toshinori Takehana at the Akita branch of the Sendai High Court rejected the appeal from prosecutors, who said Suzuka Hatakeyama, 36, should receive the death sentence for her crimes committed in 2006.
The court also rejected demands from her lawyers that her sentence be reduced.
The Akita District Court in March 2008 found Hatakeyama, of Fujisato, Akita Prefecture, guilty of murdering and abandoning the bodies of her only daughter, Ayaka, 9, in April 2006 and her neighbors’ son, Goken Yoneyama, 7, the following month.
Although the high court was more harsh on Hatakeyama concerning her intent to kill, it did not sentence her to die.
“The crimes were committed ‘on the spur of the moment’ and were not premeditated, and we can see her willingness to show remorse,” the ruling said. “Compared with past cases in which capital punishment was handed down, we do not think we should choose a death sentence as a matter of course.”
The high court recognized Hatakeyama’s intent to kill her daughter, rejecting her lawyers’ claims that the girl fell to her death from a bridge because of her mother’s negligence.
According to the ruling, on the day of the first killing, Hatakeyama and Ayaka went to the bridge because the girl wanted to see fish in the river below, but they could not spot any.
The mother pushed the girl into the river after becoming suddenly irritated when Ayaka would not leave the bridge.
More clearly than the district court, the high court said Hatakeyama intended to murder Ayaka. The ruling pointed out that Hatakeyama put her daughter on top of the railing of the bridge, saying, “We’ll go home unless you climb on top of the railing.”
The court strongly criticized the mother, saying: “It was a dangerous spot from which she could have easily fallen off. It’s incomprehensible as an act of a parent.”
When Ayaka’s body was found, police initially determined the death was an accident. Hatakeyama pretended to be a victim herself and tried to erase the memory of killing Ayaka but could not, the ruling said.
Worried that police would suspect her, Hatakeyama thought about committing a crime involving a child to give the impression that someone else was targeting children in the community, the ruling said.
Seeing Goken, who lived two houses down on the same street, walking alone, Hatakeyama invited him into her house with intent to kill and strangled him, the high court said.
The high court said the district court erred when it ruled that “Hatakeyama was in a state of being unable to immediately recall killing Ayaka” and that “it was after Goken was in the house that she harbored an intention to kill the boy.”
The high court agreed that Hatakeyama was mentally competent to make rational judgments at the time of her crimes. But the court decided against the death sentence because she was distressed over how to raise Ayaka, money was not the motive and she has the potential to be rehabilitated.
“Many of our arguments were recognized. We regret the sentence. We’ll decide whether or not to appeal the case,” the Sendai High Public Prosecutors Office said in a statement.
In the appeals trial, which started last September, Hatakeyama repeatedly said, “My memory has become unclear” and “I don’t remember,” when asked about the circumstances under which Ayaka fell from the bridge and Goken died.
Prosecutors argued that Goken’s murder was premeditated, saying, “Hatakeyama tried to divert suspicion from police and the local community (toward her).”(IHT/Asahi: March 26,2009)